로그인





연락처 :
bolle1917@gmail.com

조회 수 1263 추천 수 0 댓글 0
?

단축키

Prev이전 문서

Next다음 문서

크게 작게 위로 아래로 댓글로 가기 인쇄
?

단축키

Prev이전 문서

Next다음 문서

크게 작게 위로 아래로 댓글로 가기 인쇄

It’s now clear. Once providing a revolutionary platform with considerable revolutionary program, the IBT has succumbed to imperialist pressure and lost its revolutionary ability. It is no longer possible to be a revolutionary pole.

 

It has flinched from the struggle against imperialism, particularly the USA. The ‘Defenders of Seymour’s Marxism’(we are calling both of Tom Riely and Bill Logan’s faction because they identified themselves to defend Seymour’s formula on national question as a precious revolutionary ‘tradition’ in the debate against us.) are seeking the line of least resistance, revising Lenin and Trotsky’s lessons.

 

They are defending the treacherous position, especially for the colonial people, as ‘tradition’. They have showed cynical and bystander’s attitude on the events of imperialist ‘regime change’ and national liberation. The persistent abstentionist arguments from both factions covered by ultra-radical phrases “dual defeatism”, from the argument that “Russia was and is imperialist.” just after the Russo-Georgian War in 2008 to the neutralist position on the coups in Egypt in 2013 and in Turkey in 2016, were the result of the subordinating attitude before the imperialist pressure. (This attitude is also related with Iran, Libya, Ukraine, Syria and Venezuela.)

 

The main political axis of both is not of revolutionary vanguard but of opportunist petty bourgeois discouraged by imperialist pressure, as described by Trotsky.

 

“Theoretical Bewilderment and Political AbstentionismThroughout the vacillations and convulsions of the opposition, there is a second general feature intimately bound to the first, namely, a tendency to refrain from active participation, a tendency to self-elimination, to abstentionism, naturally under cover of ultra-radical phrases. You are in favor of overthrowing Hitler and Stalin in Poland; Stalin and Mannerheim in Finland. And until then, you reject both sides equally, in other words, you withdraw from the struggle, including the civil war. Your citing the absence of civil war in Finland is only an accidental conjunctural argument. Should the civil war unfold, the opposition will attempt not to notice it, as they tried not to notice it in Poland, or they will declare that in as much as the policy of the Moscow bureaucracy is “imperialist” in character “we” do not take part in this filthy business. Hot on the trail of “concrete” political tasks in words, the opposition actually places itself outside the historical process.”Trotsky, In defense of Marxism


Imperialism is the main origin of almost all opportunism in this epoch since the first world war and many of the individuals and groups, once revolutionary, have been victimized by the imperialist pressure and have become a part of the ‘tradition’ of opportunism.

 

We have done our best in the last decade to prevent the political degeneration, to keep the Lenin and Trotsky’s guidelines, and to clarify the differences. However, the IBT has become one of the parts in the opportunist tradition. Including Riely’s group that abruptly ran out before us for absurd reasons, “to undo the 1990 fusion”, the IBT no longer be a carrier of revolution, but became the first chain, like Kautsky, which transmits the imperialist pressure to the working class.

 

28th Oct 2018

TAG •
?

List of Articles
번호 제목 글쓴이 날짜 조회 수
» [Collapse of the IBT] The Bankruptcy and Collapse of the IBT 볼셰비키 2018.10.29 1263
27 [Collapse of the IBT] Iran, nationalism and imperialism 볼셰비키 2018.10.30 1106
26 [Collapse of the IBT] Summary of Our Thought on "Islam Revolution" in 1979 in Iran 볼셰비키 2018.10.31 1665
25 [Collapse of the IBT] On the "Farewell Comrades(resignation letter of the Riely's faction)" 볼셰비키 2018.10.31 921
24 [Our Program] Our Position on 17th presidential election of South Korea/2007 볼셰비키 2018.11.01 1235
23 [Collapse of the IBT] We are defending the tradition of Lenin and Trotsky not of Seymour (2018/0811) 볼셰비키 2018.11.08 1348
22 Defend Iran against imperialist colonial aggression! 볼셰비키 2019.06.10 1051
21 Our Questions on ICL’s position on Syria: reading 13 December 2019 볼셰비키 2020.02.29 1345
20 The Essence of Conflict on the Korean peninsula and the Response of the Working Class 볼셰비키 2020.09.18 2315
19 The Exchanges with Revolutionary Regroupment: Imperialism, National Liberation and Permanent Revolution file 볼셰비키 2020.09.21 2086
18 On the Belarusian Crisis: Down with the capitalist counter-revolution and the imperialist regime change! 볼셰비키 2021.01.20 2456
17 Myanmar Military dictatorship and working class : Some left’s very pernicious perceptions 볼셰비키 2021.04.30 3083
16 Palestinian Liberation and ‘Social Patriotism’: Down with Zionism! For the Palestinian’s Anti-Imperialist Liberation Struggle! 볼셰비키 2021.05.31 3013
15 “Worst Enemy of the Working Class” : Capitulation to Imperialism, Neutrality and ‘BT’ 볼셰비키 2021.08.04 1690
14 Defeat of Imperialism in Afghanistan and Tasks of Working Class 볼셰비키 2021.09.09 938
13 Kazakhstan: In the aftermath of the defeat of another colour revolution 볼셰비키 2022.01.18 338
12 [포르투갈] A Ditadura militar de Mianmar e a classe trabalhadora E a percepção muito prejudicial de alguns esquerdistas 볼셰비키 2022.01.23 284
11 The Petty-bourgeois Socialism and “The State and Revolution” : On the question of State Capitalism 볼셰비키 2022.03.20 281
10 Marxist speak out: “Two Key Programatic Issues for Rebuilding International Leadership” 볼셰비키 2022.05.15 408
9 Bolshevik group on the september "Call out for Action" 볼셰비키 2022.09.10 504
Board Pagination Prev 1 ... 2 Next
/ 2